Undecidability of the problem of recognizing axiomatizations for propositional calculi with implication
نویسنده
چکیده
In this paper we consider propositional calculi, which are finitely axiomatizable extensions of intuitionistic implicational propositional calculus together with the rules of modus ponens and substitution. We give a proof of undecidability of the following problem for these calculi: whether a given finite set of propositional formulas constitutes an adequate axiom system for a fixed propositional calculus. Moreover, we prove the same for the following restriction of this problem: whether a given finite set of theorems of a fixed propositional calculus derives all theorems of this calculus. The proof of these results is based on a reduction of the undecidable halting problem for the tag systems introduced by Post.
منابع مشابه
Undecidable problems for propositional calculi with implication
In this article, we deal with propositional calculi over a signature containing the classical implication → with the rules of modus ponens and substitution. For these calculi we consider few recognizing problems such as recognizing derivations, extensions, completeness, and axiomatizations. The main result of this paper is to prove that the problem of recognizing extensions is undecidable for e...
متن کاملUndecidability of the Problem of Recognizing Axiomatizations of Superintuitionistic Propositional Calculi
We give a new proof of the following result (originally due to Linial and Post): it is undecidable whether a given calculus, that is a finite set of propositional formulas together with the rules of modus ponens and substitution, axiomatizes the classical logic. Moreover, we prove the same for every superintuitionistic calculus. As a corollary, it is undecidable whether a given calculus is cons...
متن کاملSalvatore Guccione — Roberto Tortora — Virginia Vaccaro DEDUCTION THEOREMS IN LUKASIEWICZ PROPOSITIONAL CALCULI
As it is well-known, Lukasiewicz developed in [2] the many-valued propositional calculi based on two primitive connectives, negation N and implication C, which were defined semantically. Complete axiomatizations followed later on. Among the works on this argument, we mention Wajsberg [9], Rosser and Turquette [8], Mc Naughton [3], Rose and Rosser [7], Meredith [4], Chang [1], Rose [5], [6]. It ...
متن کاملAxiomatizing Propositional Dependence Logics
We give sound and complete Hilbert-style axiomatizations for propositional dependence logic (PD), modal dependence logic (MDL), and extended modal dependence logic (EMDL) by extending existing axiomatizations for propositional logic and modal logic. In addition, we give novel labeled tableau calculi for PD, MDL, and EMDL. We prove soundness, completeness and termination for each of the labeled ...
متن کاملDeduction-preserving "recursive Isomorphisms" between Theories by Marian Boykan Pour-el and Saul Kripke
Introduction. In this work we discuss recursive mappings between theories which preserve deducibility, negation and implication. Roughly, we prove that any two axiomatizable theories containing a small fragment of arithmetic—this can be stated precisely—are "isomorphic" by a primitive recursive function mapping sentences onto sentences which also preserves deducibility, negation and implication...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Logic Journal of the IGPL
دوره 23 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015